|
|
| 3.9. Design
for Sustainable, Low Maintenance Roadsides |
|
An ecologically based program of roadside vegetation
design and management seeks to produce low-maintenance,
self-sustaining plant communities. WSDOT defines sustainable
roadsides as those roadsides that are designed and
maintained with the intent of integrating successful
operational, environmental, and visual functions with
low life cycle costs. [N]
The use of native plants planted in the right location
is integral to achieving such a sustainable system.
This requires good stewardship practice in design:
- Include a Landscape Architect in the design
development process to improve the design, environmental
and visual quality of the roadsides, and chances
of planting success.
- Consider construction requirements such as site
accessibility and constraints such as contract timing
in design documents.
- Ensure noxious weeds are addressed and not incorporated
in plantings. Check with the state's noxious
weed control board for a list of noxious weeds in
the state if not available through the DOT.
- Review and comments on plans during the development
of the plans, specifications and engineering (PS&E). Maintenance
review (such as by the maintenance supervisor in
charge of the contract area) is essential because
DOT maintenance crews often maintain landscape projects
after installation.
- Have project partners review design documents
and plant material selection prior to installation. Some
projects have special partnership arrangements, for
example, the DOT might require the project sponsor
or partner to maintain plant communities. Project
sponsors have included cities, counties, tribes,
transit agencies, and other agencies, who can often
contribute labor, funding, and materials.
Integrated vegetation management plans, though oriented
to Maintenance needs and covered in detail in that
section, also provide guidance in design for sustainable,
low maintenance roads. According to the interim report
for NCHRP 20-5, 33-04, to be published in late 2004,
Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,
Maryland, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and
Washington indicated that they have policies that include
vegetation management considerations in project planning
and design phases, and Florida, Indiana, Maryland,
Ohio, and Pennsylvania have performance measures for
roadside design. [N]
|
| 3.9.1
Pre-Construction Soil Considerations |
|
| < back to top >
|
Sustainable, vigorous plant growth is difficult
to achieve on degraded soils from which topsoil has
been removed by construction or erosion. Studies have
indicated that plant available levels of phosphorous
(P), potassium (K). calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg),
sulphur (S), micronutrients, soil acidity or salt
are unlikely to limit plant growth on barren materials.
[N]
Low plant available nitrogen (N) and poor soil physical
characteristics that result in poor root development
and low water holding capacity remain the most likely
and common reasons for poor plant growth, aside from
insufficient water. [N]
The observation that nutrient deficiency may be
a cause of the decline of plant cover is thought to
result from the absence of topsoil as a growth medium;
during construction the topsoil is often buried beyond
the reach of plant roots by fill material (crushed,
unweathered, siltstones and metamorphic sediments).
[N]
The loss of topsoil and humus removes the major source
of available plant nutrients and reduces soil structure,
nutrient retention capacity and microbial activity.
[N]
Microbial activity is reduced because the loss of
organic matter eliminates the food supply of plant
decomposing microorganisms; with death, the microbial
nitrogen is available for leaching from the plant-soil
cycle. [N]
A continuing supply of plant-supplied carbon prevents
this loss. [N]
In nutrient deficient soils, mycorrhizal fungi typically
function to increase nutrient acquisition by plants.
This occurs when certain fungi colonize the plant
root and form a mutual relationship called a mycorrhizal
infection. In this beneficial infection the plant
provides energy for the fungi while the fungi provide
nutrients for the plant. The loss of the topsoil removes
the fungal spores or hyphae which are required to
begin the infection. [N]
The plant is then left without either the original
nutrient rich topsoil or the mycorrhizae necessary
to improve uptake. [N]
Claassen et al. have performed a large percentage
of the studies on topsoil usage and compost, with
funding from FHWA and Caltrans. Their work and recommendations
augment that of DOT handbooks, and are summarized
in the remaining bullets in this section.
- Stockpile topsoil. Topsoil harvest, stockpiling
and reapplication is strongly recommended wherever
possible as the best method for reestablishment of
plant communities on disturbed soils. Equivalent
levels of chemical fertilizer cannot substitute for
the benefits provided by topsoil reapplication. Topsoil
provides, in addition to available nutrients, slow
release nutrient reserves, improved soil structure
and water holding capacity, increased microbiological
activity for nutrient cycling and retention, increased
mycorrhizal infection, and a potential source of
native seed. [N]
- Because of its high soil organic matter content,
topsoil is an excellent method of providing the slow
release, high N content needed to regenerate barren
slopes, as it contains the well stabilized, slow
release N needed to reestablish plant communities,
as well as plant seeds and microbial inoculum. [N]
- Stockpiling of topsoils apparently has little
or no negative impact on topsoil quality. Caltrans
studies of stockpiled and reapplied topsoils found
that storage of topsoil material in a stockpile
for periods of up to five months is an acceptable
method of handling these materials during construction;
topsoil nutrient content and biological quality
was not degraded. Infection potential of mycorrhizal
fungi did not decrease during stockpiling. Topsoil
reapplication improved plant growth by 250 percent
after three years compared to fill slopes which
had no topsoil, with equivalent application of
all other nutrients, erosion control and seed materials.
[N]
- Topsoil fraction had to exceed 20 percent
of soil volume before significant improvements
in plant growth and soil characteristics occurred.
Higher rates are recommended in more severe environments. Plant
and mycorrhizal production peaked in the 60 percent
treatments. The researchers extrapolated these
greenhouse results to field situations by recommending 10-20
cm (4-8 in) topsoil application over
fill material, if available. If a volume of
topsoil equivalent to less than 2 cm (1 in) topsoil
is available, it should be concentrated in smaller
volumes such as in furrows or roughened surface,
rather than being spread thinly over the slope
surface. [N]
- The soil material which should be harvested
includes the "duff," including
decomposed, broken or chipped plant material and
the mineral soil material down to the color change
from the darker topsoil to the redder or grayer
subsoil. [N]
- Use of moderate amounts of fertilizer can
be used to increase the total amount of mychorrhizal
infected plants roots. Moderate fertilization
improved plant growth without decreasing mycorrhizal
root production. Mineralizable nitrogen was shown
to be predominantly derived from soil microbes.
Chemical fertilizers cannot by themselves regenerate
soils, but their moderate use in conjunction with
topsoil application was shown to be beneficial
in promoting both plant growth and increased total
mycorrhizal infection. Rates of P amendment should
be limited to the range of the 39 kg P/ha (35 lb
P/ac) treatment because the mycorrhizal infection
dropped off significantly when the P rates were
doubled. [N]
- Develop a plan for stockpiling and redistribution
within the contract's order of work. Washington
State DOT makes the following recommendations with
regard to developing a plan for soil preservation;
e.g. a plan to stockpile and redistribute existing
topsoil within the contract's order of work. [N]
Perform a site analysis
- Examine proposed planting areas for any apparent
drainage problems. Note any underlying characteristics
that might affect drainage (hardpan, compacted subsoil,
clay layers, and so forth.). Plan to correct deficiencies
or plant appropriate species.
- Analyze soil for susceptibility to erosion from
stormwater runoff.
- Determine solar exposure of slopes (slope aspect)
and its effect on soil and vegetation.
- Conduct a plant inventory or a germination test
to determine seed bank to decide if topsoil stockpiling
is practical. An examination of the site with an
inventory of existing vegetation is necessary prior
to determining when to use existing topsoil. Stockpiling
of topsoil might not be advisable when noxious weeds
and their seeds are present. Consult with a Landscape
Architect for assistance. Imported topsoil can be
used to provide a medium for plant growth when native
soil has been removed or is highly disturbed.
- Determine where to stockpile soil on-site and
the extent of clearing and grading.
- Set clearing and grubbing limits to minimize
soil disturbance. In some areas grubbing is unnecessary.
Stumps and root systems may be left in the soil
to provide stability. Decomposition of trees varies
in time depending upon species and climate, but
all decomposition provides nutrients, organic matter,
and habitat for microorganisms.
Perform a soil analysis (type, compaction,
and fertility) , including a soil test to determine nutrient
content and pH of soil.
- Obtain a soil sample bag or a plastic bag capable
of holding approximately one quart of soil
- Select a representative area for the sample.
If the soil seems to vary in color and composition
within the project area, sample those soils also.
- Dig a hole 300 to 460 mm (12 to 18 inches) deep
and set the material to the side. Scrape off a small
amount of material from the top to the bottom of
the side of the hole and place into plastic bag.
Do not include any material taken from the hole
initially. Refill the hole with the set aside material.
- Locate the test pit on the site map. If more
than one sample is taken from the site, number the
test pits to correspond with the samples taken.
- Seal the bag tightly and place in a manila envelope
and write all the information on the paper surface:
name, date of sampling, site location, and sample
identification (such as test pit #1). Fill out Soil
Test Form and include it with the sample; box or
wrap sample for mailing; and send the soil sample
to a soil chemistry lab.
- Consult with the Landscape Architect for specific
amendment recommendations when test results arrive,
if necessary.
Analyze the soil for compaction.
Appropriate soil treatment is crucial for the success
of roadside restoration (including erosion prevention
seeding). Soil compaction can be tested using the
bulk density test. Test the soil to a depth of 0.6
m (2 feet). If the density is greater than 80 percent,
take steps to break up the compacted soil. Contact
the regional Materials Engineer for assistance.
- Pay close attention to areas that have been,
or will be, staging areas. These areas will have
to be ripped to restore pore spaces between the
soil particles. Rip compacted soils, ideally in
two directions, to a minimum depth of 460 mm (18
inches) before planting. The roots of most plants
are above this depth.
- Specify in all contracts that the contractor
has the responsibility to restore the soil to a
less than 80 percent density in all staging areas.
Higher compaction rates are allowed in areas that
are critical for road or structure stability. Include
the costs of these procedures as part of the contract.
The contract should not be closed until this step
is completed.
- Revegetation success should not be based on
short term growth increases in the first season
or year, but performance and biomass production
in the 3-5 year range. [N]
- Maximum slope design for topsoil application
should be 1½:1 for fill slopes and 2:l for
cut slopes. Placement to topsoil on steep slopes
can lead to sloughing. [N]
- Where topsoil is not available other amendments
can be used, but the quantity and quality of the
N materials applied is critical. The N release
should be slow enough to keep plant-available
N at modest levels, but the total amount of
N amended should be high enough so that the site
does not run out of N before the plant community
is well established. The N amendment should be able
to support three to five years' plant growth,
for example. Controlled release of N is important
because excessive N availability promotes weedy
annual grass growth, drying out the site and crowding
slow growing perennials. While the maintenance of
moderate, sustained nitrogen levels may be achieved
from commercial, slow release fertilizer sources,
the inclusion of organic matter in the amendment
is also important to improve the hard setting and
poor water holding capacity of low organic content
materials. [N]
- Biomass associated with compost has been more
effective than N amendments that were evenly
disturbed throughout the profile (0-30 cm) or applied
deeply within the profile (20-30 cm). [N]
Studies of plant communities established on "problem
soils" amended with commercial fertilizers
have shown vigorous initial growth, but that vegetative
cover often becomes sparse or nonexistent within
several years. [N]
In addition to transportation related studies, those
of fertilized mine reclamation spoil observed that
revegetated areas tended to be highly productive
for two to five years followed by a sharp decline
in plant growth and nutrient availability. [N]
Reapplication of topsoil to subsurface materials
enhanced reestablishment of vegetation by increasing
nutrient availability, water holding capacity, and
microbial activity. [N]
Compost can be used to replace the organic matter
and nutrients and can act as a surface mulch to
protect against erosion, extreme temperatures, and
droughtiness. [N]
Long-term
nitrogen release rates from most yard waste compost
materials approached the N release rates of moderately
fertile soils. Composts were shown to be able to
regenerate the N availability characteristics of
low-nutrient substrates that have been stripped of
topsoil organic matter. Well-cured composts and co-composts
(biosolids blends) approached the N release rates
of highly fertile soils. Compost application provides
longer N release duration compared to chemical fertilizer
and also provides organic materials for improved
infiltration and microbial activity.
- Potential compost sources and soils at the
site should be analyzed before amendment, as compost
products and the soils that are to be revegetated
vary in fertility and water availability. Even
after adequate N fertility amendment, some sites
may still support insufficient plant cover if water
or other nutrient deficiencies restrict plant growth.
Improved soil and compost tests can guide selection
of appropriate amendments to harsh and variable
site conditions.
- As compost materials are variable from producer
to producer and variability in source material, processing
method and curing time have significant effects on
field performance, an interim recommendation is
to apply in the range of 72 Mg/ha (dry weight) compost
to extremely low-nutrient sites and in the range
of 36 Mg/ha compost to low- or moderate- nutrient
sites, or sites with shallow soils. Incorporate into
the top 15 cm if possible. Plant-available N
on drastically disturbed sites (on which the majority
of the topsoil and organic matter has been removed)
can typically be regenerated with a 500 to 1000 kg
N/ha application of typical, common yard waste compost.
This N application rate is roughly equivalent to
36 to 72 Mg/ha dry weight of compost (32, 143 to
64,286 lb/ac), or a volume of 85 to 170 m 3 (45 to
90 cu yd/ac), or a thickness of 0.84 to 1.7 cm (3/8" to ¾").
This rate can be reduced for sites that are not as
nutrient poor as drastically disturbed sites.
- The compost material should be moderately to
well cured, meaning 3 to 6 months curing after the
thermophillic compost process is to support plant
growth. Recognizing the variability of compost
N release behavior, the site should be monitored
to detect if plant growth is too slow so that supplemental
N can be applied if needed.
- Yard waste composts need to be aged in order
to achieve desirable rates of nitrogen release. Caltrans
research showed that nitrogen (N) release rates
change with time with a long-term incubation experience,
and that extended curing after thermophilic composting
increases N release rate. Long-term N release rates
were in the range of the reference topsoils. Finely
screened (<9 mm) compost can be applied with
hydroseeder equipment, but this application method
benefits from the addition of other structural material
(straw, coarse wood fibers) to improve erosion control
on barren slopes. The findings support the use of
compost as a primary erosion control and soil amendment.
[N]
In addition, there is an environmental and social
benefit derived from using these waste-stream materials
for erosion control.
- Avoid poorly composted or poorly cured materials,
which, will not be biologically stabilized and can
have atypical effects. Information on checking compost
processing is available at the Composting
Council Research and Education Foundation and
at website for the UC
Workshop on Compost Use for Pest Management.
Cautions regarding use of uncomposted
materials, especially in coastal regions are
also found online.
Give
special consideration to certain categories of materials,
for best utilization in field situations to avoid
negative impacts on field sites.
- Fibrous or poorly cured yard waste composts
can have an initial period of N immobilization when
high carbon materials are being decomposed. This
period may last from several months to several
years. Additional available N may need to be added
to support plant growth N during this period.
- Fibrous or poorly cured yard waste composts
may benefit soils in other ways than just N availability. Composts
are rich sources of other nutrients as well as
organic materials that improve water infiltration
into the soil and water retention within the soil.
The continued decomposition of compost by soil
microbes further helps build soil aggregates,
which improves drainage and water retention. If
weed seeds and pathogen propagules have been killed,
uncured materials can be used as surface mulches,
or incorporated if N immobilization is not a problem.
Do not transport infested, uncomposted materials
to uninfested areas.
- Co-composted materials (biosolids
blends) have much larger N release rates
than yard waste composts. Co-composts should
be used at about one half to one quarter of the
amount of yard waste compost or at sites with
rapid plant growth to absorb the higher N release
rates. Because of the slow rate of N release,
most hard waste composts are expected to have
small or non-existent potential to leach N to
watercourses, even when using large amendment
loadings.
- Sites with residual fertility (topsoils not
completely removed, or some soil material has
been re-applied to the site) may not need compost
amendment. Additional N may accelerate weed
growth. Surface applied wood chip mulches may
provide erosion control, microbial activity and
mulch effects (temperature and evaporation protection)
without the additional fertility of a composts
material.
- Non-composted materials may produce phytotoxic
compounds during decomposition. Any unprocessed
plant material amendments other than wood chips
should be stabilized using EPA regulation (40
CFR, part 503c) thermophillic composting, which
sterilizes against weed seed and pathogen propagules.
- While composts are shown to be able to replace
the N release function of native soil organic
matter the best method for revegetation is
still to harvest, stockpile and reapply the native
topsoil that was on the site before disturbance. The quality
of the organic matter is better, the harvested
soil has better aggregate structure, the soil
contains microbial inocula and site adapted plant
seeds, and the costs are often less than regeneration
of soil fertility from component parts. Extra
steps may be needed to eliminate weeds, such as
spraying, tillage or incorporation of topsoil
beneath the surface.
Plans,
Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E ) for Soil Preparation
The challenge to the roadside designer is to specify
the appropriate soil preparation for planting, to
prevent soil erosion, and to achieve desired soil
structure. Appropriate soil preparation, including
possible amendments, is crucial for the success of
desirable roadside revegetation .
- Specify soil amendments to achieve revegetation
and restoration requirements.
- Specify structural soils if needed in urban
environments. The Urban Horticulture Institute at
Cornell University has developed a cost effective
structural soil mix that can improve the survivability
of street trees in urban environments. The mix is:
- 80 percent angular stones ¾ to 1¼ inch
in diameter.
- 20 percent topsoil with organic matter content
of 10 percent.
- Soil stabilizer per the manufacturer's specifications.
- Potable water – enough to cause soil to
coat the stones without having water run off
Angular
stones form a skeleton that provides the weight-holding
capability for the mix. Specialized compaction tests
are not needed with this mix. The water-storing polymers
bind the stones together and stabilize the soil mix.
In addition, this structural soil mix leaves a large
volume of rooting space that allows the plants to
get oxygen and water. More information can be found
at the website for the Society
of Municipal Arborists.
- Specify wide-track construction equipment in contract
documents when it is necessary to work in wet soils.
- Specify stripping topsoil and stockpile for redistribution
after completion of rough grading. This is the best
source of native seeds but it is also a source of
exotic invasive vegetation and noxious weeds. (The
plant inventory and germination test performed during
the site analysis determine what plants are growing
in the soil.)
- Assess the entire project for other places to
use removed topsoil. Restoration sites are practical
locations to place excess topsoil.
|
| 3.9.2
Planning for Native Vegetation and Consistent Roadside
Design |
|
| < back to top >
|
A Federal Executive Memorandum on beneficial landscaping
became effective in April of 1994, encouraging the
use of native plants as much as practicable on all
federal lands and in all federally-funded projects.
In 2000, this EM was incorporated into Executive
Order 13148, on the Greening of Government. That
EO also required agencies to purchase "environmentally
preferable and recycled content products, including
compost and mulch, that contribute to environmentally
and economically beneficial practices." [N]
The following considerations and specifications are
recommended environmental stewardship practices in
designing with native vegetation. [N]
- Use natural region maps commonly available from
the State's Natural Heritage Program instead of cold
hardiness zones when designing with native plants.
Visit native plant preserves that can serve as references
for plantings. The State Natural Heritage Program
can recommend sites.
- Use seed mixes specific to the different conditions
on the site. Dry conditions may be present on sandy
slopes or forest edges and wet conditions in ditches,
requiring different or adjusted mixes in these areas.
- Eradicate weeds from planting site before planting.
- Consult with Native American groups and others
who use native (and other) plants for food, basketmaking,
and medicine, to avoid adverse effect on their plant
use and to develop partnerships where feasible
- Consider a line item for the contractor to control
weeds and clean equipment.
- Plant as much diversity as possible, unless an
adjacent native seed source exists.
- Match site microclimates with distinct seed mixes
as much as practical.
- Specify a locally-grown or collected source if
possible. Most native species will establish more
easily if locally grown or collected.
- Order native seed when the contract is let to prevent
unwanted substitutions.
- Limit bids to experienced contractors and approved
vendors for these projects.
- Separate the planting contract from the general
contract for best timing.
- Extend the establishment period to three years.
- Learn appropriate seed test criteria and seeding
rates to avoid waste.
- Plan for seed collection and plant salvage if native
remnants will be disturbed by the project
The following resources may assist designers. The Natural
Areas Association, an international nonprofit
with a mission to preserve natural diversity, provides
information on appropriate management of natural areas. Nature
Serve Explorer is an online encyclopedia for 50,000
plants and ecological communities of the United States
and Canada. With the common or scientific name of
a plant, it is easy to locate the life history, distribution
map, and more. The Center
for Plant Conservation site offers a State by
State Directory of conservation contacts, and the Northern
American Plant Society provides an easy way to
contact state and provincial native plants plant societies.
The Native Plant Initiative, an interagency coalition,
has worked together to share information and resources
to improve public awareness, educate their own forces,
increase planting success, and more. Their Plant
Conservation Alliance is online. USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service provides a national
plants database. USFWS provides a national
list of plant species that occur in wetlands.
WisDOT
Uses STURRA to Fund the Ongoing Use and Preservation
of Native Plants
WisDOT utilized the 1987 Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (STURAA) to fund
the ongoing use and preservation of native plants.
STURRA contains a mandatory requirement that native
wildflower seeds or seedlings or both be planted as
part of landscaping projects undertaken on the Federal-aid
highway system. At least one-quarter of one percent
of the funds expended for a landscaping project must
be used for native wild-flowers. WisDOT established
a waiver which allows the agency avoid planting native
wildflowers where doing so would be inappropriate,
but bank the unused dollars for larger projects in
the future. WisDOT also banks native plant communities
where possible.
WSDOT's
Roadside Classification Plan
Roadside management at WSDOT encompasses roadside
planning, design, construction and maintenance. The
agency identified their primary challenge in roadside
management as preservation and restoration of roadside
character and to fulfill roadside functions, regardless
of fluctuations in funding and personnel. To this end,
WSDOT developed a Roadside
Classification Plan that provides WSDOT employees
a consistent policy to follow on roadside character
classifications and appropriate treatment levels for
revegetation. The RCP is extensive roadside vegetation
management guidance that coordinates and guides all
aspects of the management of Washington State highway
roadsides. It includes treatment level guidelines for
Forest, Open, Rural, Semiurban, and Urban roadside
character classifications and treatment tools to restore
roadside character in those environments, using native
plants, Integrated Vegetation Management, and a long-term
management approach to achieve sustainable roadsides.
|
| 3.9.3
Designing for Salt Resistant Vegetation |
|
| < back to top >
|
To ensure long-term survival of vegetation in high
salt exposure environments, the Transportation Association
of Canada makes the following suggestions. [N]
- Avoid planting sites in heavy runoff collection
areas such as depressions.
- Landscaping should be planted on the back side
of ditches to permit maintenance access and ensure
that salt laden roadway runoff is not directed towards
plants.
- In urban areas protect newly planted conifers
by erecting burlap screens during the winter months.
- In urban areas consider applying anti-desiccants
and anti-transpirants to the tender shoots of sensitive
plants.
- Use species tolerant of salt laden runoff. The
following categories of species may be considered:
Example
7 : List of Salt Tolerant Trees and Shrubs
Salt Tolerant Trees
Common Horsechestnut (Aesculus hippcastanum)
Serviceberry (Amelanchier canadensis)
Maidenhair Tree ( Ginko biloba )
Honey Locust ( Gleditsia triacanthos )
Tulip Tree ( Liriodendron tulipifera )
Colorado Blue Spruce ( Picea pungens glauca
)
Mugho Pine ( Pinus mugho )
Austrian Pine ( Pinus nigra )
Jack Pine ( Pinus banksiana )
Hop Tree ( Ptelea trifoliata )
White Oak ( Quercus alba )
Red Oak ( Quercus rubra )
English Oak ( Quercus robur)
Black Locust ( Robinia pseudoacacia )
Moderately Salt Tolerant Trees
Amur Maple ( Acer ginnnala )
Manitoba Maple ( Acer negundo )
Yellow Birch ( Betula alleghaniensis )
Paper Birch ( Betula papyrifera )
White Ash ( Fraxinus americana )
Large-toothed Aspen ( Populus grandidentata )
Trembling Aspen ( Populus tremuloides )
Cottonwood ( Populus deltoides )
Black Cherry ( Prunus serotina )
Japanese Pagoda Tree ( Sophora japonica )
Eastern White Cedar ( Thuja occidentalis )
Salt Intolerant Trees
Balsam Fir ( Abies balsamea )
Red Maple ( Acer rubrum )
Sugar Maple ( Acer saccharum )
Silver Maple ( Acer saccharinum )
Eastern Redbud ( Cercis canadensis )
Shagbark Hickory ( Carya ovata )
Black Walnut ( Juglans nigra )
Ironwood ( Ostrya virginiana )
Norway Spruce ( Picea abies )
Red Pine ( Pinus resinosa )
White Pine ( Pinus strobus )
Scot's Pine ( Pinus sylvestris )
London Plane Tree ( Platanus acerifolia )
Douglas Fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii )
Basswood ( Tilia americana )
Littleleaf Linden ( Tilia cordata )
Hemlock ( Tsuga canadensis )
Salt Tolerant Roadside Shrubs
Silverberry ( Elaeagnus commutata )
Sea Buckthorn ( Hyppophae rhamnoides )
Common Ninebark ( Physocarpus opulifolius )
Choke Cherry ( Prunus virginiana )
Staghorn Sumac ( Rhus typhina )
Buffaloberry ( Shepherdia canadenis )
Snowberry ( Symphoricarpus albus )
Japanese Tree Lilac ( Syringa reticulata )
Moderately Salt Tolerant Shrubs
Forsynthia ( Forsynthia ovata )
Red Cedar ( Juniperus virginiana )
Mock Orange ( Philadelphus coronarius )
Smooth Sumac ( Rhus glabra )
Elderberry ( Sambucus canadensis )
Salt Intolerant Shrubs
Grey Dogwood ( Cornus racemosa )
Red-osier Dogwood ( Cornus stolonifera )
Winged Euonymous ( Euonymous alatus )
High-bush Cranberry ( Viburnum trilobum )
|
| < back to top >
|
| |
| Continue
to Section 3.10 » |
| |
|
|