About a quarter of DOTs have undertaken a statewide
inventory of at least one invasive species in the ROW;
however, nearly a third of responding DOTs say they
do not plan to implement a statewide survey in the
future due to concerns about cost. The following DOT
efforts stand out:
- The Maryland State Highway Administration (MDSHA)
tracks the location and quantities of certain invasive
species on ROWs statewide. In particular, the agency
is trying to achieve and document a 25 percent reduction
in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in the
ROW, by 2008. Tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) has
also been targeted.
- Minnesota DOT (Mn/DOT) is working on a research
initiative with the University of Minnesota to develop
a statistically valid weed sampling system in order
to determine weed extent and whether Mn/DOT is gaining
or losing ground.
- Montana (MDT) is completing a noxious weed inventory
of all roadsides in 2005.
- New York State (NYSDOT) has developed an extensive
electronic inventory and with control information
for the Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program, which
is then used in annual meetings with partners to evaluate
and continuously improve treatment efforts, adjust
plans, and ensure accountability, as necessary. Counties
are increasing in sophistication as well; some NY
counties are maintaining GIS data for tracking and
controlling infestations of priority invasive.
- Colorado and North Carolina DOTs have utilized
GPS to map and track larger, problem sites.
- Ohio DOT is exploring combining their endangered
plant inventory program with an invasive plant inventory.
- Washington State (WSDOT maintains area IVM plans,
with treatments tracked in an associated database.
A number of states, including LADOTD, Mn/DOT, and
NYSDOT, have been tracking and evaluating control of
particular invasive over smaller areas (i.e., not statewide)
sometimes using GPS units with sub-meter accuracy (MN).
While statewide surveys have not been undertaken in
Arizona, within the Maintenance division, the Arizona
DOT has been utilizing the annual Level of Service
surveys to map invasive species within rights of way.
Maintenance staff use that information in management
and work planning. Maintenance and construction staff
take weed awareness training to identify invasive/noxious
species and control them.
|
| 9.4.1
Inventory Approaches and Use |
|
| < back to top >
|
State DOTs have performed inventories in a variety
of ways, but by far the most common method has been
inventory by local maintenance yards/districts. Temporary
staff and universities have been hired, and DOT office
technical staff helped in a number of cases. Alabama
was the only state to have a university conduct the
inventory statewide, though after attempting to perform
an inventory through county weed coordinators, the
Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is working
through the Montana State University (MSU) and the
Agricultural College to hire temporary employees to
conduct the inventory, with support from MSU staff.
Washington State DOT involved counties, in that case,
noxious weed boards. In almost all cases, updating
of the database/GIS occurs through ongoing observation
by maintenance staff.
Of those DOTs that have undertaken a survey, over
two-thirds used Geographic Positioning Systems (GPS)
and GIS. States using GPS to map stands of invasive
species and invasive species include Iowa, Kansas,
Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Oklahoma, Missouri,
New Mexico, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia; such GPS/GIS
information can then be used to track treatment effectiveness.[N]
Implementation of a mapping system is an element of
the IRVM Plan for Mn/DOT Maintenance Area 3B. To accomplish
this, CAD maps were obtained from Mn/DOT and plat books
obtained from the county. The maps that were developed
included established areas of noxious weed infestations,
hazard trees, native seeding, and other important elements
of the management plan. These maps are updated and
assist in program planning, record keeping, and assessment.
Paper-based map systems are widely being converted
to Geographic Information Systems (GIS). NCHRP
20-5, 33-04 reported that Maryland and Utah have
connected their IRVM plan to GIS and GPS.[N]
Washington State (WSDOT) is utilizing ArcIMS (Information
Management System) to track both species location and
treatment effectiveness.
New York State DOT's Inventory Model
In addition to maintaining an electronic database
of all priority invasive plant locations identified
in association with Capital project development and
delivery, NYSDOT strongly encourages all transportation
Regions to initiate and manage an inventory of priority
invasive plant species for the highway systems within
their jurisdictional area. NYSDOT's directions identify
four species of statewide priority to include as a
starting point and common basis in any inventory. Additional
consideration is recommended for region-wide priority
species established through participation in Weed Management
Areas, the Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program,
Watershed Management Plans or similar planning efforts.
For prioritization purposes, the Regional inventories
begin with the Interstate, Expressway and Parkway Systems,
the primary introduction and dispersal conduits for
invasive plant species. NYSDOT calls for a similar
format and compatible databases for Regional inventories,
with variability expected regarding the specific inventory
methods and parameters included in the Regional inventory.
The forms NYSDOT uses for data collection and monitoring
are attached in appendix C. NYSDOT also has a sample
database format available for sharing.
NYSDOT recommends establishment of a Regional Inventory
Coordinator and a multi-discipline Regional Team. Although
inventory information has been coordinated by the headquarters
Environmental Analysis Bureau primarily through the
Regional Maintenance Environmental Coordinators, design
and construction staff are now collecting inventory
information as well.
NYSDOT describes the following inventory methods
in the agency's Environmental Procedure Manual: [N]
Sample Inventory Methods:
- Collect reference marker location information and
complete the Inventory Data Collection Form for manual
entry into GIS project; or
- In GPS "Mapping Mode" collect "Point" GPS
coordinates from the center of the plant infestation
and complete pre-programmed GPS data dictionary attribute
information, or NYSDOT Inventory Data Collection Form,
for each point; or
- In GPS "Mapping Mode" collect "Line" GPS "start" and "pause" coordinates
for linear plant infestations or collect "Area
or Polygon" coordinates for patches, complete
pre-programmed GPS data dictionary or NYSDOT Inventory
Data Collection Form thus allowing GIS to map and
sum the inventory information.
Collecting information in this manner facilitates
entry into a Regional Invasive Species GIS Project.
Each Regional Maintenance Environmental Coordinator
receives electronic copies of the NYSDOT Invasive Species
Inventory database and copies of the NYSDOT Inventory
Data Collection Forms attached in Appendix C of this
document. This information can then be utilized during
project development as a site screening tool and provided
to maintenance staff for risk assessment and planning
for necessary roadside maintenance activities or for
implementing additional "pre-emptive" invasive
species controls. As these regional databases develop,
NYSDOT aims to track and monitor progress of control
efforts at regional and statewide levels and contribute
to larger statewide and region-wide inventory programs,
e.g. Weed Management Areas, Adirondack Park Invasive
Plant Program, Watershed Management Plans, etc.
Other Inventory Examples
Two other sample inventory methodologies that are
currently in use in New York State are: 1. The Adirondack
Park Invasive Plant Program (APIPP) Methodology www.adkinvasives.com ;
and 2. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Weed Information
Management System (WIMS). www.TNC.org.
The APIPP methodology has been implemented in portions
of 12 Counties in Regions 1, 2 and 7 inside the 6.5
million acre Adirondack Park since 1999. NYSDOT's data
forms are modeled closely after the APIPP forms. This
inventory is conducted mutually by NYSDOT, TNC, APA
and volunteers. The database is managed by the Adirondack
Nature Conservancy with GIS products produced and distributed
by NYSDOT. Information is collected through the use
of mail-in post cards that provide the approximate
location of suspected invasive plant infestations.
These post cards have been distributed to NYSDOT maintenance
staff and a network of volunteers. Cards are mailed
to the Adirondack TNC and staff visit the site to confirm
the post card information and enter the data onto a
field data collection form, by reference marker (blank
form attached), and then into the APIPP ACCESS database.
This information is then sent to NYSDOT, entered by
NYSDOT into the APIPP GIS system and species-specific
location map are produced and distributed to APIPP
partners and participants. The Invasive Plant Council
of NYS has promoted use of The WIMS database generally
adopted by TNC as their national standard.
How DOTs Are Using
Collected Information
DOT roadside invasive species inventories are all
used to identify and locate areas for treatment, invasion
by new species, and to set priorities. DOTs also indicated
that inventories are being used to:
- Partner with other agencies in providing funding
for control of specific species (CA).
- Estimate expansion of weed presence (AL, MT), monitor
treatment results and acres infested (AL, WA).
- Guide and evaluate invasive species control efforts
(CA, CO, FL, IN, MD).
- Guide effort/budgeting to meet established goals
(MD).
Just one state has determined the rate at which weeds
are spreading: Alabama DOT estimated that the acreage
of Cogongrass (Imperatacylindrical) is
expanding at a rate of 20 percent per year within Alabama.
Nevada DOT was able to estimate the accuracy of an
inventory contracted out by the department, by checking
it against maintenance spray logs from weed crews;
the agency found the inventory was 25 percent different
(75 percent accurate) by the time spraying was conducted.
The agency attributed this to the accuracy of the study
rather than the spread of weeds during the interim.
Alabama DOT is also using their database to monitor
treatment results.
Maryland SHA's inventories (each September from 2002
through 2004 for Phragmites and in December 2004 for
Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense) are being used
to chart current control efforts and to provide information
on how much effort needs to be put into the program
to meet targets.
Inventory/Mapping,
Monitoring, and Analysis Resources
BLM, FS, FWS, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
conduct inventory/mapping in coordination with county
and state agencies. Other resources of inventory or
mapping, monitoring, and analysis of invasive species
include:
Remote sensing has played an increasingly important
role in identifying large-scale weed infestations.
Remote sensing provides information on the location,
quantity and condition of land cover, which can be
compared over time. The success of remote sensing as
a monitoring tool largely depends on the instrument,
the topography, size of infestation, timing, and the
ability to distinguish target plants from the landscape.
Three to five meter scale mapping and hyperspectral
analysis is often necessary, during the flowering season,
for detection of larger populations of invasive species.
TxDOT has been able to identify large populations in
this manner.[N]
Protection of Native
and Rare Plant Communities in the ROW
A number of states are beginning to identify rare
plant species in the ROW and tailor ROW management
to encourage native species. California, Colorado,
Delaware, Iowa, Missouri, Minnesota, New York, and
Wisconsin are among the DOTs which have begun to preserve
high quality roadside remnant native habitats, Karner
blue butterfly habitat, and other sensitive habitat
types.[N]
These initiatives typically have several common elements:
- Mapped information is combined from multiple agencies.
Typically, the primary mapped data on known plant
locations of rare species is obtained from the state
Natural Heritage Program. Other potential contributing
agencies may include the state DNR or Forest agency,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service (USDA-FS), Native
Plant Societies, Department of Agriculture, knowledgeable
individuals, and local counties.
- Upon completion of the initial data compilation
phase, field surveys are conducted in some cases.
- Special Management Areas are set up with particular
management practices.
- Maintenance forces are educated regarding the special
maintenance needs of and expectations in these areas.
- Tracking of species condition and progress may
occur.
|
| 9.4.2
Monitoring and Follow-Up |
|
| < back to top >
|
Monitoring the numbers of a pest species killed
or removed is a measure of the work being done but
is not a measure of invasive species control. Success
of an invasive species control project can be measured
by monitoring numbers of the pest species that remain,
and ultimately the condition of the ecosystem they
are in. Removing an invasive alien species from an
ecosystem will not automatically lead to the return
of the indigenous flora and fauna. While this is often
the case, removal of one alien species may simply open
the way for colonization by another. Monitoring of
the impact of control actions needs to be put in place,
preferably starting with small-scale activities to
verify the impact of control operations, and if the
results are not as expected, the management plan may
need to be reconsidered and adapted in light of this
new knowledge.
In most cases successful eradication programs need
to be accompanied by prevention measures against re-colonization
by the removed species and early warning systems should
be put in place to detect colonizers early. A new infestation
of the successfully eradicated species can be wiped
out swiftly when detected early by using the appropriate
eradication method, because the knowledge of the negative
impact of the invasive species and the experience in
controlling the species is established and will be
supported by those previously involved.
|
| 9.4.3
Information Management and Decision Support Systems
in EDRR |
|
| < back to top >
|
Effective systems of detection and response require
ready access to data. For invasive species, these
needs may be most efficiently served from a central
system, or at least standardization of a designated
system for each group of invasives. Needs that have
been addressed in the National Invasive Species Council's
(NISC) Invasive Species Management plan include: [N]
- Database of existing and potential invasive species
in the U.S. with current:
- Geographic information
- Identification details
- Control information
- Database of institutions and experts for identification
and biology of invasive species in each taxonomic
group.
- Database of people and groups to contact in case
of detection, depending on geographic location, type
of invasive species, and potential threat (for use
by a reporting point).
The National Invasive Species Council is charged
with establishing a coordinated, up-to-date information-sharing
system which emphasizes the use of the Internet for
documenting, evaluating, and monitoring impacts from
invasive species on the economy, the environment, and
human and animal health. Although there are many sources
of information concerning invasive species, incompatible
database formats and other factors impede information
sharing.
The Council is currently developing an information "gateway" accessible
through the Council's webside- www.invasivespecies.gov.
The Council plans to help develop a fully integrated
Internet-based network system that will eventually
support rapid and accurate discovery of data, the automatic
correlation and synthesis of pertinent data from many
sources, and provide a presentation of the results
of data synthesis that meets the needs of users. The
long-term goal is to provide accessible, accurate,
referenced, up-to-date, comprehensive, and comprehensible
information on invasive species that will be useful
to local, State, tribal, and Federal managers, scientists,
policy-makers, teachers, students, and others. To help
ensure that stakeholder needs are met, the Council
has formed a steering committee that includes State,
tribal, Federal, and local governments, non-government
organizations, the private sector, and other stakeholders.
Some basic elements of this site are now in operation,
and work is ongoing.
Weed Information
Management System (WIMS)
The BLM developed the "WIMS" over 10 years
ago and has since built upon the system in cooperation
with others. BLM developed the database called "Boise-Vale" to
capture inventory, monitoring, and control information
for noxious and invasive weeds on BLM lands. BLM still
uses the model of "Boise-Vale" but has developed
a national web-based and spatial database for the BLM
to which all offices will convert once it is completed.
BLM's database now incorporates information about all
invasive species on BLM managed lands, but its primary
purpose is to collect weed data. Since the database
is considered public domain, TNC has taken the database
and improved its components. The database on which
TNC, BLM, FWS National Refuge System, USGS National
Institute of Invasive Species Science, Oregon, and
the California Department of Food & Agriculture
collaborated is available for free and may be used
to track invasive species occurrence data, current
status, and treatment information.
As currently maintained by TNC, the Weed Information
Management System (WIMS) is a Microsoft Access-based
relational database application that is designed to
assist natural resource managers in managing their
weed data. It can be used as a stand-alone database
application that resides on a laptop or desktop computer,
or can be used in combination with a handheld unit
to collect field data. WIMS keeps track of three types
of data records: weed occurrences (GPS point locations),
assessments (size and status of the weed infestation
to facilitate monitoring over time), and management
treatments applied to those weed infestations. Data
can be easily exchanged between multiple users, exported
in NAWMA (North American Weed Management Association)
standards, and written to shapefiles for mapping in
any standard GIS program. A variety of reports can
also be easily generated.
Field data collected with handheld electronic data
recorders can be easily downloaded into the database.
WIMS can be used on a handheld unit (either MS Windows-based
Pocket PC or Trimble) with a GPS unit to capture data
in the field. When using WIMS on a handheld unit with
an ArcPad interface, a site manager can use background
imagery and other GIS layers for mapping weeds, then
upload the new data into the database automatically.
A
more detailed look describing WIMS capabilities
is available on-line, along with a PowerPoint presentation that
demonstrates how WIMS is organized and how WIMS can
be tailored to organization-specific efforts. A user
manual on how
to enter data in WIMS and use it is available
on-line, as are WIMS
Installation & Downloadable Files to run the
software.[N]
Reviews of hardware tools useful for those working
in invasive species management are also available
on-line at TNC's site, tool
reviews.
Utah DOT's RoadVeg
GIS system
UDOT's vegetation management professionals use ROADVEG,
a geographic information system to inventory invasive
plants along with other transportation-related data.
UDOT staff can track the spread of invasive plant species,
monitor the progress of mitigation strategies, and
query and display various vegetational attributes as
needed. To date, about 1,360 linear miles of Utah roadways
have been field-assessed and scored. As funding becomes
available, the remainder of the state's major roadways
will be inventoried. Utah State University assisted
in the road and county land inventory process.
PennDOT Roadside
Spray Application (RoSA)
PennDOT has developed a Roadside Spray Application
(RoSA) system, a web-based GIS application developed
with Microsoft's .NET. RoSA assists PennDOT District
Roadside Spray Specialists with collecting, storing,
and reviewing herbicide spray activity along state
highways. The output data from this application will
serve as a status report for the districts, state,
and outside agencies (e.g. Department of Agriculture,
EPA). The system was developed to relieve District
Roadside Specialists from having to tally results and
sums and develop summary spraying reports, by hand.
System users include PennDOT central office and districts,
counties, and outside contractors. The system allows
PennDOT's statewide roadside manager to oversee all
roadside activities more effectively, including cost
and production figures.
According to PennDOT's vegetation manager, "RoSA
is taking the department's spray information from the
file cabinet to the 21st century of GIS mapping and
database reporting…The development of RoSA has
been an exciting and worthwhile experience which will
allow our local maintenance operations to inquiry and
map spray information in minutes from their computers." Users
input data on the location of the spraying, the type
and amount of chemicals used, the contract and date,
weather conditions, the applicator of the spray mixture,
and material and resource costs. The system enables
map views of new and historical spray data, and easier
data collection, storage, and retrieval. Counties and
districts are also using the system to reorder chemicals
based on usage figures.
RoSA on the web
Caltrans GIS for
Locating Appropriate Plant Species
Caltrans is developing a GIS to help employees quickly
access lists of plant species for revegetation that
are both ecologically appropriate for the project site
and potentially useful in minimizing erosion from roadcuts
and roadsides. The GIS uses hydrologic units of CALWATER
at 1:24,000 as a means to link physiographic and climatalogical
data together with presence or absence of selected
plant species in each hydrologic unit. Plant climate
classifications are being refined using elevation contours
and topographic aspects derived from digital elevation
models to allow assignment of different plant climates
to portions of hydrologic units that exhibit steep
elevational gains or considerable landform diversity.
Through the overlay of other data depicting county
boundaries, roads, and places, users are able to locate
project sites, query the plant species climate matrix,
and export data tables to spreadsheets or reports.
Guidebooks that index the same plant species climate
matrix through a standard route+county+mile/km georeferencing
system make these data available to district personnel
in an alternate format as well.[N]
Caltrans is also developing a ROW inventory system,
which will include all resources in the ROW, "from
stop signs to salamanders." One foot resolution
aerial photography will allow prediction of species
most likely to be there. Caltrans and UC-Davis plan
to perform resource and land use modeling to generate
a variety of useful information, from the viability
of wildlife crossings to the presence of different
natural communities.[N]
NYSDOT's Plant Database
NYSDOT's plant database is updated annually with
occurrences mapped in GIS for four base species and
additional ones in some Regions. Detailed information
on more species is collected by volunteers and partners
within the Adirondack Park. Sites are prioritized for
management and updated manually. A field coordinator
performs quality control for the system. NYSDOT is
incorporating invasive species inventory with NPDES
outfall mapping, herbicide recertification and application,
and other ongoing departmental activities. Information
collection forms for the database are included in the
Appendix resources in Chapter 11.
|
| < back to top >
|
| |
| Continue
to Section 9.5 » |
| |
|